Contact O'Dwyer's: 271 Madison Ave., #600, New York, NY 10016; Tel: 212/679-2471; Fax: 212/683-2750
 
ODWYERPR.COM > News return to main page

May 18, 2005

PR LEGENDS ADDRESS THE INDUSTRY
 

"It's the best of times and, in some cases, the worst of times," said Harold Burson, the octogenarian chairman and co-founder of WPP Group's Burson-Marsteller who was part of the O'Dwyer Company's "Greatest Generation in PR" event on May 17 at the Yale Club in New York.


Al Golin and Harold Burson at the O'Dwyer's event.
         Photos: Thomas Johnson, Camera One

Burson said that at industry gatherings in previous years, the PR industry would lament its fight for respect within an organization. "People would say, 'Management doesn't appreciate us,'" said Burson. "I don't think that's happening anymore."

Burson was among featured panelists including Al Golin, chairman/co-founder of GolinHarris, Margery Kraus, founder/president/CEO, APCO Worldwide, Daniel Edelman, founder/chairman Daniel J. Edelman Inc., and David Finn, chairman/co-founder of the Ruder Finn Group.

The panelists regaled the audience with stories of their beginnings, some accidental, into the PR field and discussed past, present and future issues in PR.


Dan Edelman and David Finn

Edelman acknowledged recent controversies surrounding the industry while calling on PR to fill the void left by the diminishing importance of 30-second ad spots.

"We can't have a meeting like this without realizing that we've been hit," Edelman said in reference to recent PR controversies in the media. He also called on the industry to find "common ground" on video news releases.

He noted recent advertising cuts by pharmaceutical companies led to only slight sales drops, one of several signs that indicates "mass marketing is over."

"The future is PR as the center," Edelman said. "It's the holding company. It's not advertising. It's not an adjunct."

PR's formative years

Burson said the evolution of PR from its formative years in the 1930s and '40s hit a peak during the '60s amid sweeping social change in the U.S. Calling the '60s PR's "most vibrant period," he marked the ascendance of PR executives in corporations as a testament to its acceptance in the upper levels of companies.


David Finn jokes with the audience.

Burson noted PR directors eventually rose to be senior VPs during the '80s, later becoming executive VPs and part of companies' executive committees today. "I think that's a tremendous recognition of the function of PR," he said.

He said the advent of legislation like civil rights, consumers' right to know and environmental regulations, all of which fostered sweeping social change, also evolved the question generally posed to a PR person from "What do I say?" to today's "What do I do?"

David Finn said the practice of PR "really hasn't changed that much" in the last 45 years as he read from a book about PR he wrote while in his 30s, which he said still applies to the field today.

Finn called on PR to own up to its ethical responsibilities in the face of pressure from clients or other forces. He called on PR pros to do their "homework," to "come closer to the kind of research a lawyer does when he takes on a case."


Golin urged PR pros not to listen to the 'naysayers.'

"For the most part we're in a difficult position," he said of decisions sometimes faced when clients put pressure on a firm to perform. "We have to find a way to advocate the positions that we ourselves respect in the bottom of our minds."

Golin channeled author John Naisbitt (Megatrends) in telling PR pros to balance high-tech with "high-touch." Golin quipped about a colleague who was e-mailing and leaving voicemails from an office 30 feet away.

On the recent PR controversies, Golin warned: "We're now becoming more of the problem than the solution." But he said the industry has to be careful not to overreact.

"We can't listen to the naysayers and we have to take some chances and keep taking risks," he said. "We need to focus on reading the public mind, and not manipulating it."


Margery Kraus sees significant growth potential for PR in Asia.

Burson lamented that CEOs today are under tremendous pressure to produce strong earnings results, pressure which he said has caused ethical lapses and some of the corporate scandals in recent years. He noted that earnings goals are no longer set by companies, but by outside entities. "Too many corporations are not going to be able to sustain investor confidence," he said.

Kraus discussed the growth potential for PR overseas. "The world is shifting East," Kraus said, in reference to the region where she thinks PR will show the most growth in coming years. She said growth in the Chinese market is obvious, but India could be second down the road and other areas like Malaysia and Indonesia could be surprises.

Asked how corporate social responsibility can benefit a company and be quantified, she said: "Many companies overseas are raising the standard of living in the areas in which they operate." She also warned, "There are dangers now of not being a good citizen."

Few regrets

The panelists were also asked about their best and worst moves during their decades at the helm of some of PR's largest firms.


Jack O'Dwyer, editor-in-chief for O'Dwyer publications, at the May 17 event.

Burson, who said he got into PR for $50 week and a car (double his newspaper salary in Memphis), said his best decision in 45 years was to open an international office in Geneva in 1961 to give the company a global presence, even though B-M had not yet reached $1 million in revenue and only had about 25 people on staff. "That differentiated Burson-Marsteller," he said. He also joked that he regretting becoming an "international expert" a year later.

Burson also said deciding not to grow the firm through acquisition whenever possible to create a consistent culture throughout the world was another good move.

Finn said his worst decision was opening offices all over Europe and in Japan, losing money, then closing them all and retreating to the U.S. He said it took awhile for the firm to build back.


Kevin McCauley, editor of O'Dwyer's, introduced the 'greatest generation' panel.

His best decision was to focus on ethics from an early stage and to create an ethics advisory board 40 years ago, a move which came out of hiring a PR executive and a New York Times reporter who pled the 5th during the McCarthy communism hearings. After more 5th amendment "pleaders" came looking to Ruder Finn for jobs, Finn was prompted to seek advice from an ethicist and that led to the firm's first ethics board, which is still in place and usually includes a priest, rabbi and other academics.


Mort Kaplan, professor of marketing communication, Columbia College Chicago, moderated the panel.

Edelman said his best move was bringing aboard his son Richard and let him lead the company. His worst move was to "assume that everybody you hire is honest." Edelman said that the company dealt with a handful of people who were "as Richard would call them, 'crooks'" over the years.

Pointing out the age of his fellow panelists, Edelman joked: "PR is supposed to be a great pressure business … but it's a good field for longevity."

Golin said he and his firm are at their best when they "follow our gut." He said bad decisions have arisen "when we listen to the naysayers."

 
E-mail to a friend
Tell O'Dwyer's what you think
Responses should include your name and affiliation, which will be withheld at the writer's request. Commentaries on subject matter are welcome. Personal references are not allowed. O'Dwyer's reserves the right to cover any story it deems newsworthy.

Responses:
 

Ron Levy (5/19):
For Mr. Burson, these are neither the worst of times nor close. It's now a little over 50 years since his tiny PR firm affiliated with the ad agency of Marsteller, Rickard, Gebhardt & Reed -- and was allowed space up on the third floor of a modest brownstone in New York's East 30s.

On days when the lone elevator (which may once have been a dumbwaiter when the brownstone was a home) wasn't working, Mr. Burson and his early-to-rise-late-to-retire employees had to walk.

Today he has thousands of employees and one of Scandinavia's largest buildings has the name of his firm in huge stainless steel letters several stories up on the front.

It's interesting that a management method -- a view of hosesty -- that made his firm so successful was also used by the Edelmans, Al Golin and David Finn.

To work for these leaders, you had to be honest, not only under the law, but also honest with clients. It could be very tough to tell a client that a client idea is lousy. It's tough to tell a client that you'll neither lie to nor even mislead an editor. Nor is it easy to report that a project failed -- not that results are still coming in but that the project FAILED.

But the managers of these firms adhered to the honesty-with-clients rule even when it could mean losing a good account -- and maybe the knowledge of having to own up held down to a tiny minimum te number of projects that failed.

Today as a result of the rule, not only are these leaders richer but also the PR profession. Many of us have known the anguish of being betrayed by someone we trusted totally, but betrayal never afflicted the clients of these firms. (This is not to say that being told an idea is lousy was not for some clients more anguish than they chose to bear.)

Ethics in PR Fan (5/19):
These great leaders of PR and PR journalism are clearly sensitive to the need for ethics -- and wary of the crooks -- but don't report (at least in this story) what to watch out for.

To the rescue: a fascinating piece further down in this newsletter (the PR WARNS SENATE story) explains the "how" -- ways, some little known, in which the crooks can get you.

Mike Paul, president, MGP & Associates PR (5/19):
Great event! Thanks Jack!

We look forward to more events like this is the future.


 

Editorial Contacts | Order O'Dwyer Publications | Site Map

Copyright © 1998-2020 J.R. O'Dwyer Company, Inc.
271 Madison Ave., #600, New York, NY 10016; Tel: 212/679-2471