Contact O'Dwyer's: 271 Madison Ave., #600, New York, NY 10016; Tel: 212/679-2471; Fax: 212/683-2750
 
ODWYERPR.COM > Top Story return to main page

May 3, 2001

PR SHARES BLAME

PR firms played a major role in the dot-com collapse, Richard Edelman told the Reputation.com Conference in London today.

"We willingly canonized CEOs, created buzz and relied on hype," he said during his keynote speech. Edelman said PR firms were lured by the "hot money" of "impatient financiers" who poured millions into the marketing communications sector.

Those investors demanded a quick return on their investments. PR firms took that money and conducted "whoopee-cushion PR."

They cooked up various stunts for dot-com clients, and fell back on "press agentry" gimmicks. Edelman said PR must develop new standards of excellence.

"We must have publisher-level content, and we cannot rely on media to correct factual errors.

"We must have transparency, disclosing sources of information and revealing our presence in chat rooms.

"We must also offer fact-based information, not hype or spin.

"We need to encourage dialog and inform all stakeholders simultaneously as information becomes available," he said.

Dot-com advertising also flopped

Edelman said PR faces an unprecedented opportunity to make inroads against advertising.

He noted that Ad Age publisher Rance Crain said he is appalled by "dot-com advertising that was so pointless, so stupid, so tasteless that it shook the faith of corporate chieftains in the power of advertising for their own brands."

PR can step into the fray, according to Edelman.

"We are the kings of complexity.

"Advertising must now follow public relations because we build the credibility of claims and establish the positioning," he said.

 

Click here to e-mail this story to a friend

Click here to tell O'Dwyer's what you think about this story
(Responses, if any, are posted on this page.)

Responses:

 

Let's face it. Many firms saw a quick buck and jumped on the bandwagon. Sure, companies like Edelman roped in big clients, but did they do their clients justice?

Many of us decided to take the high road, working with clients who had legitimate expectations. We told them what we could do to help their business and then we achieved it. That's why some PR firms are holding strong, and others are loosing profits and laying off staff.
--Unknown (5/8)

Edelman's PR spin on PR spin ... "the industry" (not *us*) did bad things! "The industry" hyped dot-coms too much! "The industry" needs to reinvent itself! Oh brother.

Just shows what a bunch of crap PR is!
--Anti-PR PR person (5/7)

Richard Edelman would like to put a blanket of guilt over the entire public relations industry because his agency and others over-hyped the dot.com businesses that are failing faster than physical flatulence.

Keep the blame yourself, Richard. And, for all the guilt you feel and admission you took client money and then let them down --- hey, start up a foundation with the forum topic being How PR Practitioners Should Point Guilty Fingers at Themselves First and Foremost---and Return Fees to Clients Upon Admission of Major Failure.
--Jim Monahan, PR IMPACT "The Consultants' Marketing & Public Relations Consultants," 9933 Lawler Ave., Skokie, Illinois 60077 (5/7)


 

Editorial Contacts | Order O'Dwyer Publications | Site Map

Copyright © 1998-2020 J.R. O'Dwyer Company, Inc.
271 Madison Ave., #600, New York, NY 10016; Tel: 212/679-2471