Morgan Stanley and Goldman Sachs gave up millions in fees in order to rank high in deal-making tables, notes consultant Russell Perkins, who says such rankings are “absurdly influential.”
Perkins, who heads Infocommerce Group, Bala Cynwyd, Pa., cited a March 20 Bloomberg story that said Morgan Stanley and Goldman Sachs gave up millions in fees to get credit on a big merger they did not work on so that they would keep their high rankings in M&A ranking tables.
The investment banks wanted credit for working on the $25 billion sale of Forest Laboratories to Activis in February even though neither actually had a role in the deal, said the Bloomberg story by David Welch that withheld the names of his sources.
The banks, using previous contracts with Forest, negotiated to get credit for the deal in exchange for millions of dollars in fees that they were owed, said the sources.
“It’s a form of buying league-table credit,” Prof. Erik Gordon of the University of Michigan told Welch.
The Bloomberg story cited the ranking of Dealogic, which is not available on the firm’s website.
Mergermarket.com publishes such a table which shows Goldman Sachs as the No. 1 financial advisor in deals in 2013 -- 304 worth $604 billion. No. 2 is JPMorgan with 656 deals worth $563B.
The firm also publishes a table showing the top PR advisors in such deals.
Biz World Hot on Rankings
Perkins, who was previously president/CEO of Dorland Healthcare Information and who has a background of 25 years in database publishing, said rankings have become hugely important in recent years as a quick way to sift through the oceans of information flooding the web.
|Mergermarket league table of PR advisors.
He said that just about every business and industry he knows of has a ranking of one sort or another.
Figures, he said, are mostly self-reported or based on statements of CPAs.
Told about the O’Dwyer PR firm rankings, which are based on tax documents such as top pages of income tax returns and W-3s showing total payroll, he said he knows of no other ranking that collects such documents.
The fact that Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley would give up millions in fees to keep their top positions speaks volumes about the importance of rankings, he said.
The banks are “two prestigious, successful and extremely savvy companies that hardly need more publicity and or name recognition,” he noted. He added they are “wiling to trade millions of dollars in fees to push themselves higher in a list that ranks transaction activity…the bragging rights and marketing value of ranking highly will be worth many more millions than those they walked away from.”