Thinkman2 (5/06):
So the hall of fame has to reject someone because of political
views. Fascinating! A total raw racist by the name of Ty Cobb
remains an honored and storied occupant sans any "disgust."
What does that tell us? Likewise a couple of anti-Semites
are around there, but that's ok. There is an old communist
response to opinions not liked: it is to purge the holder
and eradicate his memory. So much for the scared idiots.
Wise Old Man (4/15):
Sometimes the simple stuff gets the most complicated. There
certainly wasn't any surprise in the positions that Mr. Robbins
and Ms. Sarandon had advocated. Therefore why was Mr. Petroskey
"forced" to cancel the event?
Had his concern been one of what he might consider "inappropriate
comments" there never would have been a "Bull Durham"
event scheduled. Now frankly, I could care less about the
views of a couple of actors, so it seems to me that Mr. Petroskey's
sole intent was to "shame" the two actors and show
people who share his beliefs how committed he is to them.
PR Honcho (4/15):
How pathetic. The Hall of Fame is afraid of a couple of movie
stars. That's right up there with Hootie Johnson's fear of
Martha Burk. The conservatives of this country need to take
a deep breath. It's OK to disagree. This is America.
PR
in Seattle responds to PR Honcho (4/15):
Why do you assume it is "fear" of Mr Robbins and
Ms Sarandon? I think it is more a case of disgust.
PR
Honcho responds to PR in Seattle (4/15):
No, it's fear. The hard right want to silence their critics.
Look at the way Cheney and Rummy bristle at the slightest
whiff of criticism. They even want to silence potential
criticism (so the Hall tells Robbins and Sarandon to stay
away). As you undoubtedly know, conservatives prefer demagogues
like Rush, Savage and O'Reilly to thoughtful, meaningful
debate and dialog because they fear some might listen.
Sick of Hollywood
(4/15):
Cheers! Cheers! for the Baseball Hall of Fame to snubb these
liberals!! They are so out of step with the mainstream in
America that it is laughable.
One hundred percent of their Iraqi-war predictions have NOT
come true. They owe the country an apology.
Harry Prestanski
(4/15):
Why is it that people equate free speech with "rights
to any forum." The Hall and Museum have every "right"
to choose speakers, events etc as they wish. I happen to disagree
with the way this was handled, but the whining of Mr. Robbins
points out how certain celebrities think that their status
demands "access." Cancellation of appearances of
people who find themselves controversial is not new.
As a PR professional, I have had to evaluate use of spokespersons,
guests for events, etc. and how their being associated with
an event or organization would impact the public perception
of the organization or event. And based on Mr. Robbins controversial
stance and criticism I think many organizations would have
to consider cancelling or postponing his appearances during
these times.
One of the reasons many influential people, such as celebrities,
sportspeople, etc. are invited to such events is to attract
attention, build awareness, gain public acceptance through
their "endorsement" by such appearance.
Consequently, an appearance by Mr. Robbins at any event may
suggest that the organization supports and agrees with Mr.
Robbins' political stance. This is even taken to the degree
of corporations not wanting their products being associated
with certain events--why airlines cancel ads after an airline
disaster, why major corporations pulled ads during the Iraqi
War.
I think it laughable that people are shouting "free
speech" but would deny it to private organizations who
excercise their free speech by choosing to cancel events and
appearances. Mr. Robbins believes that "whining"
can provide him with the same forum he was denied. Unfortunately,
both the Hall and Mr. Robbins are both seen as losers in the
media.
Mr. First Amendment
(4/15):
Thank goodness for Dale Petroskey and his Brain Police for
anticipating what we should hear and not hear. I thought the
ability to express oneself freely was another one of our National
Pastimes.
While I don't agree with Robbins and Sarandon on their political
positions, what great harm could they have done to this event?
The owners and players have done their parts in denigrating
the game.
If I were Robbins, I'd forget about it; public opinion seems
to be on his side.
|