Contact O'Dwyer's: 271 Madison Ave., #600, New York, NY 10016; Tel: 212/679-2471; Fax: 212/683-2750
 
ODWYERPR.COM > PR Commentary return to main page
Seitel
Fraser P. Seitel has been a communications consultant, author and teacher for 30 years. He may be reached directly at yusake @aol.com.

He is the author of the Prentice- Hall text The Practice of Public Relations, now in its ninth edition, and co-author of Idea Wise.


Order from Amazon.com

IdeaWise
Click to order

Jan. 24, 2005

KETCHUM CALAMITY POST MORTEM
 

"Now you understand, Ms. Ketchum, that there is no more pivotal program to the President's domestic agenda than No Child Left Behind. The reason the Department is spending $1 million on PR is to make sure the American people understand the importance of No Child Left Behind to the future of our nation.

"So we need to go beyond advertising. We need third party support, particularly in the inner city. What we'd like to do is enlist some friendly Black influentials -- somebody like Armstrong Williams -- to speak on behalf of the program on talk shows and in the press. We can even pay them for helping promote our program.

"Any problems with that?"

So began the Department of Education/Armstrong Williams/Ketchum Public Relations imbroglio that last week ended with a red-faced Ketchum issuing a reluctant mea culpa a day after The New York Times slammed the firm for its ethical failure and two weeks after USA Today exposed the fraud.

Much has been written about the Ketchum calamity -- even more than the equally egregious Fleischman-Hillard bill-padding scandal in Los Angeles. The irrepressible Jack O'Dwyer, for one, labeled the Ketchum mess "a huge embarrassment to the PR industry." And Jack, for once, is absolutely right.

The people at Ketchum who passed on that question above either forgot, or worse, were never aware of the fundamental principles that ought to underpin public relations counsel and separate it from other advisors, like lawyers.

Had the Ketchumites considered these PR basics, even for a moment, they never would have risked the firm's reputation by agreeing to such a hare-brained scheme.
Here then, as a public service to all those practitioners of public relations who don't quite understand what the heck this field ought to be about, are the four PR principles that Ketchum forgot.

PR Principle #1 - Do the right thing.

Simple right?

If only…

Any counselor who has gone nose-to-nose with a CEO and his lawyer, hoping against hope that the bad news won't make the papers, knows that advising them to "do the right thing" isn't always easy.

Sometimes, it may be downright suicidal.

If Martha Stewart's PR consultants had had the gumption to suggest she admit that she lied to federal investigators, they may well have risked the wrath of the diva of domesticity. But had she followed such advice, Dame Martha might not now be baking brownies in the slammer. The "right thing" in that case was coming clean about the error she made.

In the case of the Department of Education, secretly paying Armstrong Williams to shill for NCLB clearly was the "wrong thing" to do. Ketchum should have known that and immediately counseled its client to forget about it.

The basic question counselors must pose to clients for every idea proposed is, "Are we willing to own up to this if it were exposed tomorrow morning on the front page of The New York Times?" Or USA Today?

PR Principle #2 –
Tell the truth.

A smart public relations advisor will always counsel clients to avoid being defensive.

"Be proud of what you sponsor," is the advice typically proffered. "Be willing, proudly and in public, to stand up for what you stand for."

The reason conservatives adore Rush Limbaugh and liberals listen to Paul Krugman is that both make no bones about where they stand, what they support, and who they would ship to Camp GITMO on the next transport.

Typically, when celebrities appear as spokespeople for a product or company, they acknowledge the affiliation. For better or worse.

"This is Lance Armstrong for Bristol Myers Squibb."

"The whole McNabb family loves Campbell's Chunky Soup."

"I'm Whoopi Goldberg, and I use Slim-Fast."

Could Williams have told the truth to interviewers that the DoE was paying him to vouch for No Child Left Behind?

You betcha'.

Clearly, the Department and its PR counsel feared that if Williams acknowledged the identity of his sponsor, he wouldn't be able to land interview gigs to promote the program.

Nonsense.

Their target was cable television for god sakes, not sophisticated academic journals. As long as Williams was controversial and outspoken -- he was -- neither CNN nor MSNBC nor Fox nor BET nor any other cable outlet would have cared if he mentioned his paid affiliation. For example:

"I should say in full disclosure, that the Department of Education buys ads on my TV show, but I gotta tell you that I've vigorously supported school vouchers for a decade."

As far as the cable talk shows are concerned, as long as you tell the truth about the sponsorship, they'll leave it to the viewers to decide if you're sincere.

That's why Donald Trump and Al Sharpton and other assorted shills are given cable carte blanche to shamelessly tout their wares whenever they feel like it.

PR Principle #3 –
Admit you were wrong.

This was probably Ketchum's most onerous violation. Once the USA Today story appeared, its goose was cooked.

Williams, to his credit, recognized this instantaneously and was out in flash, admitting his error.

"I apologize for my poor judgment in continuing to write about a topic which my PR firm was being paid to promote," he said.

By contrast -- but predictably -- the Department of Education became a deer in the headlights and remained paralyzed in "no comment" mode.

And so, inexplicably, did Ketchum.

Obviously, the firm wasn't paying attention in recent years, as public figures from Mme. Stewart to Gary Condit to the boys from Enron got dragged down in silence, while others similarly charged, from Kobi Bryant to Hugh Grant to Randy Johnson were spared because they quickly admitted the error of their ways.

Finally, a day after New York Times columnist Stuart Elliott laid the wood to the firm for clamming up; Ketchum issued its lame "lapse of judgment" apology.

Saying "I'm sorry" may, indeed, be PR 101. But it's usually good advice nonetheless.

 

PR Principle #4 –
You are judged by the company you keep.

The difference between PR counselors and lawyers is that every client, no matter how heinous they may be, is guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution the right to the aid of legal counsel. There is no such Constitutional guaranty for public relations counsel.

In other words, if your client wants you to do something illegal, unethical or wrong -- then they shouldn't be your client. As a practical matter, of course, it's hard to walk away from a $1 million fee, especially if you've got a public company parent breathing down your neck to "make your numbers."

But in public relations, you are judged by the company you keep. In the final analysis, all you've got in this field is your "reputation." And as a result of the Department of Education/Armstrong Williams fiasco, Ketchum's reputation has taken a direct hit.

And so, too, alas, has that of the public relations business.

 
E-mail to a friend
Tell O'Dwyer's what you think
Responses should include your name and affiliation, which will be withheld at the writer's request. Commentaries on subject matter are welcome. Personal references are not allowed. O'Dwyer's reserves the right to cover any story it deems newsworthy.

Responses:
 

PR Skeptic (1/26):
Ketchum is either totally clueless or cunningly cynical. Pay a conservative political commentator to shill for the agency's client? And to shill in favor of a politically charged program, one targeting minority kids, with the "spokesperson" a member of the key minority?

There are a number of politically connected PR shops that perform blatently partisan conversative campaigning and don't disguise it. Ketchum should just come out and admit it's lobbying--er, working for the White House. Either way, the agency's ethics are right where they should be--a part of the Fox School of TV Journalism.

Chicago PR Guy (1/25):
As I've been saying on this page for a long time, this outsourcing appeal is the biggest threat yet to big agencies and small ones, too.

Thinkman2 (1/25):
I could not disagree with you more, and the law disagrees as well. You may not think it logical, but the law forbids government propagandizing and certainly paying off people to sell politically created policies.

Whether one agrees with the No Child Left Behind policy or not, the law does forbid what occurred. Nobody wants to leave a kid behind, but many believe this is a policy that is better labeled than realistically implemented.

The various armed forces do sponsor programs for money but only for recruitment and do not try to sell political policies(at least so we know it.)

And they do indeed identify whose budget pays for the ads. If the Carter bunch broke the rules, as WSJ claimed, they should have had the riot act read to them the same as Ketchum and the Bush folks. Your claiming it was ONLY cable stuff is irrelevant.

Would the Bushies have provided payola for an open debate on this policy? Of course not.

You have more than just the rep for PR and Ketchum here; like it or not, there is a law on the books to deal with this, and it doesn't mention any political party.

Call off the dogs (1/25):
This is not a crisis in the PR industry and Ketchum did what any other firm would do. It tried to distance itself from blame when Williams took the rap. The public view of PR is dismal enough and we haven't come close to explaining the complexity or difficulty of what we do. The press which needs us has been no help either.


 

Editorial Contacts | Order O'Dwyer Publications | Site Map

Copyright © 1998-2020 J.R. O'Dwyer Company, Inc.
271 Madison Ave., #600, New York, NY 10016; Tel: 212/679-2471