 |
More than 80 percent of the journalists surveyed in a new study say that they still depend on PR professionals for news. However, more than half (53 percent) say that the information they receive is often inaccurate.
The 2021 PR Media Report, conducted by Global Results Communications, polled 1,026 journalists between March and May of this year, asking them how they view PR practitioners.
A large majority of respondents value the relationship between journalists and PR pros. Only 10 percent said that their relationships with PR professionals were “not important.” Close to two-thirds (62 percent) said the relationship was an important one, and over a quarter (28 percent) called PR people “a core resource.”
When it comes to what kind of content journalists are most likely to use, the media release is number-one by a long shot, with 60 percent of respondents citing it as the top source. Such content as pitches/article abstracts (15 percent), press kits (8 percent) and contributed articles (6 percent) lagged considerably behind.
 |
Opinions about the helpfulness of content received from PR pros vary considerably. While only 11 percent label such content as “not helpful,” an even smaller number (10 percent) rank it as “very helpful.” Most respondents landed somewhere in the middle, with 34 percent ranking the content they receive as “helpful” and 45 percent as “somewhat helpful.”
Respondents were also asked how many pieces of content they receive per day. More than half (51 percent) said the daily total was somewhere between 11 and 50, and 31 percent received 10 or less. On the other end, six percent said that they get more than 100 pieces of content per day, with 12 percent getting between 51 and 100.
The main reason for a piece of content to not be used, respondents said, was that it had “no relevance to readers,” which was cited by 53 percent. About a third (30 percent) said they steer clear of content that they deem “too promotional,” and eight percent said they had turned down content that had “no editorial value, insight or perspective.”
What respondents want is “respect/understanding of what journalists need.” Almost half (45 percent) said that was the quality they most appreciate in a PR professional. However, more than half (56 percent) also said that was the area most in need of improvement.
“Overwhelmingly, members of the media want relevance and mutual respect,” said GRC founder and CEO Valerie Christopherson. “As the landscape of news dramatically changes, there no doubt, it is time for PR to change, too.”
Most people are willing to trust AI—as long as it stays in its own lane. That’s the takeaway from Mission North’s “The New Rules of Trust," a report that looks at how the public evaluates corporate reputation and at what brands need to do to maintain credibility and relevance.
Executives are moving faster, embracing flexibility and making decisions with urgency even in the face of uncertainty, a new study from Padilla finds.
The global economy is threatened by a wave of insularity that is cutting people off from the world beyond their immediate environment and making them more unlikely to listen to—or do business with—people from other countries or with opinions different from theirs, according to Edelman’s 2026 Trust Barometer.
While the danger of being on the president’s bad side is seen as a major source of concern for brands, the potential negative effects of artificial intelligence pose an even greater reputational threat, according to Global Situation Room report.
While predictions of economic improvement in the coming year from corporate and financial decision makers are down slightly from last year’s numbers, the overall outlook is still strongly positive, according to a new survey from Teneo.
