![]() |
WPP agreed today to pay $19M to settle Securities and Exchange Commission charges that it violated anti-bribery and internal accounting controls measures of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act.
The SEC alleges WPP carried out an aggressive acquisition push in high-risk markets and failed to apply its internal accounting controls and compliance policies, allowing financial autonomy to the founders/CEOs of the target companies.
The federal watchdog claims that due to structural deficiencies, WPP failed to promptly respond to warning signs of corruption at various subsidiaries.
It cited a WPP India unit that continued to bribe government officials in return for advertising contracts, even though WPP received tips about that misconduct.
The SEC order also covers control deficiencies in China, Brazil and Peru.
Neither denying nor admitting the SEC findings, WPP agreed to cease and desist from committing violations of the anti-bribery, books and records, and internal accounting controls provisions of the FCPA.
It will pay $10.1 million in disgorgement, $1.1 million in prejudgment interest, and an $8 million penalty.
"A company cannot allow a focus on profitability or market share to come at the expense of appropriate controls," said Charles Cain, the SEC's FCPA unit chief. "Further, it is essential for companies to identify the root cause of problems when red flags emerge to prevent a pattern of corrupt behavior from taking hold."
WPP notes the SEC probe covered activities that occurred under the leadership of founder/Martin Sorrell, who stepped down in 2018.
"The Commission's findings relate to control issues as well as the acquisition and integration of companies in high-risk markets until 2018, it noted in a statement. "As the Commission's Order recognizes, WPP's new leadership has put in place robust new compliance measures and controls, fundamentally changed its approach to acquisitions, cooperated fully with the Commission and terminated those involved in misconduct."


It's almost always possible to recover from past mistakes, but the way the Met handled the John Galliano fiasco is an object lesson in how not to do that.
How to reach audiences who have stopped trusting the biggest names in media.
It's not just the tech sector—when companies in any sector grow rapidly, what happens to their ability to manage, learn from and prevent critical issues from evolving into full-blown crises?
FGS Global’s Paul Holmes, Molly Levinson of TLG Communications. Trident GMG’s Joshua Galper and Brunswick Group’s Ellen Moskowitz all placed in the top level (Tier 1) of individual practitioners in the recently released Chambers rankings for both crisis & PR communications pros and those working in litigation PR & communications.
Gregg Feistman, M.A., Professor of Practice in Public Relations at Temple University and former corporate communications executive, joins Taking the Lead to discuss the frameworks leaders can use to determine when to speak up or stay silent.



