![]() |
There is a huge chasm when it comes to support the Iranian invasion between the Americans and Israelis.
A whopping 82 percent of Israelis support the ongoing slaughter in Iran, according to a poll by the Israel Democracy Institute. Only 13 percent disapprove of the action, according to a poll by the Israel Democracy Institute.
It’s a far different story here. Only 36 percent approve the US and Israel takedown of Iran. A majority (54 percent) disapprove, according to a NPR/PBS News/Marist poll.
Ian Bremmer’s GZERO Media notes that wars generally become less popular over time, and the economic and inflationary impacts of this conflict could be severe, at least in the short-term.
Growing US opposition to the war will force the hand of Donald Trump to declare “mission accomplished” in Iran in an effort to avoid a crushing defeat in the November midterms.
Souring American public opinion of the Iranian carnage will pressure prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu to ease up on his air force's bombardment of civilian site.
MAGA super-hawk Lindsay Graham has already urged the Israelis to be more careful in their targeting of Iranian assets.
"Our goal is to liberate the Iranian people in a fashion that does not cripple their chance to start a new and better life when this regime collapses," he posted on X on March 8. "The oil economy of Iran will be essential to that endeavor.”
Netanyahu isn't interested in regime change in Iran. He would just like the entire country to disappear.



If you’re like a lot of people, you have been obsessed with “Love Story,” the FX series that has been airing for the past eight weeks about JFK Jr. and Carolyn Bessette. But why didn’t Kennedy use crisis PR to deal with the paparazzi, the news media and the tabloids?
Much is made of the importance of proper planning to anticipate and manage a crisis—but what matters most is understanding how decisions will be made once the crisis is underway.
Slow and procedural messaging without emotional resonance, fragmented leadership communication, overwhelming policy‑heavy language and a pervasive gap between words and observable action have repeatedly undermined corporate credibility.
New York Magazine profiles 78-year-old Peggy Siegal, who was once among the most powerful publicists in the Big Apple, in an article headlined: "The Grand Dame of the Epstein Files.”



