New Yorkers will board buses to Albany Tuesday, April 4 to lobby for what would be the largest statewide universal single-payer healthcare system, billed as “like Medicare, but better.”

The New York Health Act passed the Assembly by large majorities in 2015 and 2016 but still needs four votes in the Senate, says The Campaign for New York Health. 

Campaign for New York Health

Buses are leaving from Manhattan, Brooklyn, the Bronx and Westchester as well as Long Island. Car pools are also being encouraged.

Registrations are being sought by midnight today.

Campaign Lists Arguments for the Bill

The Campaign for New York Health says the bill would provide comprehensive, universal health coverage for all New Yorkers and would replace private insurance coverage. Health care providers would work to keep people healthy while New York Health pays the bill, says the Campaign.

1. Freedom to choose your health care providers. There would be no network restrictions. Only patients and their doctors – not insurance companies – would make health care decisions.

2. Comprehensive coverage. All New Yorkers, regardless of immigration status, would be covered for all medically necessary services, including: primary, preventive, specialists, hospital, mental health, reproductive health care, dental, vision, prescription drug, and medical supply costs – more comprehensive than commercial health plans.

3. Paid for fairly. Today, insurance companies set the same high premiums, deductibles, and co-pays, whether it’s for a CEO or a receptionist, and a big successful company actually pays less than a small new business.

Under New York Health, individuals and employers would not pay premiums, deductibles and co-pays.

Gerald FriedmanGerald Friedman

Instead, coverage would be funded through a graduated assessment on payroll and non-payroll taxable income, based on ability to pay.  For 98% of New Yorkers, it will be a substantial reduction in what they now spend. Prof. Gerald Friedman, chair of the UMass/Amherst Economics Dept., estimates savings of up to $45 billion yearly and says there would be savings for New Yorkers with incomes up to $400,000, with the biggest share of savings going to middle-class families.

4. Less administrative waste, better care, more accountability. The total cost would be $45 billion less than what we now spend, because we wouldn’t be paying for huge insurance company administrative costs and profits or for the costly time and paperwork health care providers spend for dealing with insurance companies. Health coverage would be accountable to the people of New York, not to insurance company stockholders.

5. Job-friendly. Health care costs are a significant and unpredictable problem for business. These costs as a share of payroll have increased 50% in a decade, with small group rates increasing almost 7% on average in 2014, and New York businesses spend over $2 billion annually just to administer health benefits.  The New York Health Act simplifies and reduces costs for employers – large and small – by taking them out of the business of buying health coverage. That would make New York dramatically more job- friendly, especially for small businesses, start-ups, low-margin businesses, local governments and taxpayers, and non-profits.

6. The most affordable way. Any plan that keeps insurance companies in the picture means wasting close to billions of dollars each year. The cost of eliminating financial barriers to health care and providing universal coverage would be more than offset by savings on administration and through negotiated pricing for pharmaceuticals and other services.