 Ronn Torossian |
Tesla, Inc. has been battling ups and downs in recent years. Every time the company breaks through another impossible barrier, it seems another barrier is waiting to block its progress. In recent years, it was the slow production of the Model 3 and the oft-delayed development of a Tesla pickup. Now, a California safety agency is investigating Tesla’s Fremont, CA factory. Multiple media reports say Cal-OSHA announced the investigation, but didn’t disclose what may have triggered the investigation, so speculation is now running wild. So far, the only official statement made about the inspection was “we take seriously reports of workplace hazards … work-related injuries and illnesses …”
Right now, the only other thread reporters are tugging on in this case is a rumor that Tesla hasn’t been properly reporting work-related injuries at the Fremont plant. One such article alleged that Tesla has “artificially lowered” the total number of injuries by claiming some of those injuries were more minor than they actually were, or that they were really personal medical issues as opposed to work-related injuries. While Tesla hasn’t replied officially in the media, the company did publish a blog post countering the rumors about under-reported injuries. In the blog post, Tesla called the rumors: “a calculated disinformation campaign against Tesla …”
Others are claiming Tesla is objecting too much to a company doing its job. In recent years, Cal-OSHA has investigated Tesla 20 times. Results varied. Sometimes the complaints were dismissed. Sometimes, Tesla was fined. Speaking to the media, Tesla says that’s to be expected: “Cal-OSHA is required to investigate any claims that are made, regardless of whether they have merit or are baseless (as we believe these are), and we always provide our full cooperation …”
It looks like we’ll have to wait until this investigation is completed to see which direction the headlines will run on this one. If Tesla has been under-reporting its work-related injuries, that could be a nagging public relations problem, as the company is trying to get its Model 3 program back on track. Especially since the company has said it has a much better safety record than the two previous automakers that operated out of that plant. Meanwhile, Tesla founder Elon Musk is focused on the lagging Model 3 production. The company recently had to temporarily pause production to address several production problems. Now, Musk is promising the company will run 24/7 to get production caught up.
With that kind of schedule, workplace safety will certainly be a focus, for both the company and safety watchdogs.
***
Ronn Torossian is CEO of NY PR agency 5WPR.
It's not just the tech sector—when companies in any sector grow rapidly, what happens to their ability to manage, learn from and prevent critical issues from evolving into full-blown crises?
FGS Global’s Paul Holmes, Molly Levinson of TLG Communications. Trident GMG’s Joshua Galper and Brunswick Group’s Ellen Moskowitz all placed in the top level (Tier 1) of individual practitioners in the recently released Chambers rankings for both crisis & PR communications pros and those working in litigation PR & communications.
Gregg Feistman, M.A., Professor of Practice in Public Relations at Temple University and former corporate communications executive, joins Taking the Lead to discuss the frameworks leaders can use to determine when to speak up or stay silent.
Sam Singer, the Bay Area’s go-to crisis PR guy, today celebrated his client OpenAI’s “tremendous victory” over Elon Musk.
Deepfakes have crossed a critical threshold from an emerging concern to an effective tool, where any public figure is now a target for AI-enabled reputational manipulation. Here’s what PR pros need to know.
